Skip to main content

The Marriage State in 'Pride and Prejudice'

           “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife,”[1] is the opening line of Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. The opening line serves as a way to introduce to the reader the topic of the novel—marriage and the courting process. By beginning with this line, Austen has framed the environment that dictates the ‘means and ways’ of marriage in English society. However, what follows thereafter in the novel, provides an insight into the ‘state of marriage’ by having some couples who abide by the norm, and others who rebel against the convention. In the novel, four marriages occur, but for the purposes of this essay, only the marriages of Charlotte and Mr. Collins, Lydia and Wickham, and Elizabeth and Darcy will be addressed. In tackling the issue of marriage, Austen has crafted a picture where those who abide by the norm, end up in a state of marriage that is delusional. Whereas those who go against the superficialness of marriage are the ones, that Austen epitomizes as a true marriage. By the end of the novel, Austen has questioned the process of marriage, for by having Elizabeth and Darcy as the main couple—it is clear through the dialogue and the narrator’s commentary that marriage should be more than just a business transaction. It should also incorporate one’s sentiments. Through the three marriages, Austen distinguishes them carefully, by spending time interpreting and delving into the reasons for each marriage. This is aimed at the reader, for she hopes that a conclusion can be drawn that marriage is intended to unite two people, for the benefit of each’s happiness, only if it is embraced by true sentiments (like love and affection). The individual, in Pride and Prejudice, is what is emphasized in the novel. The convention of marriage is personified as being the watchdog in society, where men and women have little control over their lives, but Austen, through Elizabeth (and Jane), break free from the chains of being objects of marriage, to being individuals in the ‘state of marriage’.
            Before going into the marriages in the novel and interpreting Austen’s take on the different accounts, it is important to look closely at what she means in the opening line of the novel. As stated before, it introduces the topic of the novel, but it also divulges the factors that determine marriage. The opening line reads, “It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.”[2] What this sentence reveals is that single men are the ones who are in “control” of marriage at this time. In addition, women do not have a say in this convention, for the sentence implies that a woman is merely a benefit for the single man. Sentiments (like love or affection) do not guide marriage, for there is an obligation attached to being a man who happens to be single and with money, on getting a wife. Austen has characterized the fruition of marriage as being merely a platonic, partnership with no consideration on the wants and desires of the individual, especially of women. This is clearly demonstrated in the opening, second sentence of the novel,
However little known the feelings of views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that is considered as the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.[3]
It is of no importance that a man and a woman should have a prior relationship before entering into a union, but rather, it all concerns the economic aspect that should a single, rich man come into a neighborhood where there are outed to-be “brides,” the transaction of marriage shall concern  the economic gains of each other.  This in retrospect commodifies the individuals, in diminishing the individuality of the person, to simply the material gains that come with such person.
            The commodification and value of the individuals, is a result of marriage, and is best exemplified by the marriage of Mr. Collins and Charlotte. Mr. Collins and Charlotte have no desire of weighing the intentions of marriage on sentiments or physical attributes, but rather who can benefit each other.[4] Mr. Collins and Charlotte’s way of seeing marriage embodies the convention of the opening line of Pride and Prejudice, for Mr. Collins only wants a “companion” (Austen, 103), while Charlotte only wants “security” (Austen, 123). This marriage follows the model of the established convention, and through this marriage, Austen highlights the nature of how the established convention has led to superficial unions. Even though Austen does not directly intervene and voice her criticisms, she does it indirectly, through Elizabeth and the narrator.  When Charlotte tells Elizabeth of her engagement, Elizabeth reflects the news and sees it as a “humiliating” (Austen, 123) experience for Charlotte to accept Mr. Collin’s proposal, considering that Charlotte does not care fondly of Mr. Collins.[5] However, to reiterate, both of them do not care either. The individual is simply not looked at. Elizabeth’s concerns are valid, but there is nothing that can be said to save Charlotte from the dullness of being with Mr. Collins. Elizabeth thinks so and is reflected when she visits them at their home and thinks to herself, “But she [Charlotte] had chosen with her eyes open.”[6] As stated in the introduction, Austen wants to address the lack of individuality in the ‘state of marriage,’ and she has cleverly incorporated this aspect into her novel, through which characters (like Elizabeth) assume the availability to choose partners.
            Freedom to choose who one wants to marry is an important aspect to Austen’s critique of the ‘marriage state,’ however there is a caveat to who is allowed to choose. It is only the men. It all ties back to the opening sentence of the novel.  Women have no say in the marriage transaction. Elizabeth, when she comments that Charlotte “had chosen with her eyes,” mistakenly assumes that Charlotte had the ability to say no—she (Elizabeth) can, as shown when she rejected Mr. Collin’s proposal[7]—Charlotte cannot because her adherence to the convention of marriage and her superficial perception of it, does not take into account one’s personal sentiments on the union. Charlotte’s logic only concerns whether the partner can provide security, and if so, she is willing to give up her sentiments (and individuality) for just that. Through these acts, Austen wants to shed light to the non-existent freedom that women have, should they simply look at marriage in such a technical and superficial way. Elizabeth is Austen’s pioneer to inspire women to expect more than just complacency.
            The union of Charlotte and Mr. Collins place emphasis on the stability of a companion and of finance. The critique of their union is the lack of the individual and one’s sentiments, but there is a limit to how far character (individuality) should influence marriage, and that is where Lydia and Wickham come into the picture. Their union is the means in which Austen critiques why relying on the physical aspect of the individual, can create a bad marriage. Subtly, this also concerns the marriage of Mr. Bennet and Mrs. Bennet. Lydia is concerned with the art of flirting and attention, and she is able to work on this through her admiration of the officers, which leads to her encounter with Wickham on the account that he has a “gentlemanlike appearance.”[8] When she meets Wickham, she has developed a superficial crush on his beauty, and has no desire to know more about the individual. When she pleads to go to Brighton, her only goal is to be crowded by the “young and gay [men]…seated beneath a tent, tenderly flirting with at least six officers at once.”[9] The physicality of one’s beauty and a desire to be addressed for it creates temptation that blinds the individual from being rational in choosing a partner. Wickham is no exception to this. His first choice is in fact, Elizabeth, for “she had been the first to excite and to deserve his attention…the first to be admired.”[10] However, Elizabeth is yearning for more than just a good-looking guy. But even so, Wickham has a reservation on who he chooses to marry, and that reservation concerns status and his desire for wealth. His choosing of Miss King is similar to the way that Mr. Collins decides to go after Charlotte. Wickham did not pay attention to Miss King, until she had been given an inheritance.[11] He is willing to set aside his desire for the individual (even if it is superficial), for material gains. He is able to freely pursue this because of his beauty, as is exemplified by his lack of money, yet he is able to become indebted, and the town still favors him.[12]
            Jane Austen’s inclusion of Wickham and Lydia’s union, after they are forced to marry each other because of societal conventions, shows her critique of the ‘state of marriage,’ in that it should not be based on outer beauty, but the beauty on what is in the inside. This type of marriage is not lasting, and the outcome for Lydia and Wickham, is foreshadow by the inclusion of Mr. Bennet’s desire to marry Mrs. Bennet. He was “captivated by youth and beauty,”[13] even though their characters did not match all, for he was concerned about books and thought, and she with the mundane world. After their coming together in marriage, his affection for her disappears, just as it does for Lydia and Wickham: “His affection for her soon sunk into indifference; her’s lasted a little longer.”[14] Through the convention of marriage in society, Lydia’s (and Mr. Bennet’s) consideration solely relies on their temptation, and Wickham’s desire for wealth, create two marriages that create indifference, and alienate the individual.
            The balance between the desires of the outer world (wealth and personality), and the inner world (one’s sentiments, individuality) is exemplified through the union of Elizabeth and Darcy, but it is Elizabeth that is able to make the union possible. The marriages of Charlotte and Lydia (and to an extent Jane), come together through the means of others, meaning that their marriages form under the control of those not in the union. Elizabeth, however, breaks free from the control of the ‘state of marriage,’ when she not only refuses the (companionship) proposal of Mr. Collins, but when she also refuses the economic benefit and personal beauty of Mr. Darcy’s first proposal. All the other marriages are pursued, except for Elizabeth’s. She is not actively looking to find a husband, but rather to define herself.[15] At the end of the novel, Austen epitomizes the marriage of Elizabeth and Darcy, because they formed their union not only in a judicious manner, but that they formed it through their choosing and individuality.




[1] Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. London: Penguin Classics, 1996. 5.
[2] Austen, p. 5.
[3] Austen, p. 5.
[4] Austen, pp. 103, 112, 123.
[5] Austen, pp. 112, 120.
[6] Austen, p. 209.
[7] Austen, pp. 102-118.
[8] Austen, p. 71.
[9] Austen, p. 224.
[10] Austen, p. 149.
[11] Austen, p. 151.
[12] Austen, pp. 306-7.
[13] Austen, p. 228.
[14] Austen, p. 366
[15] Austen, pp. 345-359.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Re-Post "Marriage Equality, Immigration, and … Fraud?"

This article comes from Concurring Opinions  (a group blog on legal topics), posted by Kerry Abrams. Very interesting article/post concerning DOMA's invalidation of Section 3, and what it means for binational same-sex couples when it comes to their marriage and immigration. Marriage Equality, Immigration, and … Fraud? posted by Kerry Abrams The demise of DOMA may mean that same-sex married couples are now entitled to the same marriage-based immigration benefits as anyone else. But marriage equality also entails equal burdens. As I argued in Immigration Law and the Regulation of Marriage, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1625 (2007), immigration law holds marriages involving immigrants to a higher standard than the law ordinarily demands, and this will now be true for same-sex couples. Under state family law, married people are not required to live together. They don’t have to open joint bank accounts, jointly own property, take extensive vacation photos, document which guests attended

Favorite Lines/Quotes from Sophocles' AJAX

      Well then, now you’ve seen his arrogance,       make sure you never speak against the gods,       or give yourself ideas of your own grandeur,       if your strength of hand or heaped-up riches                                     [130]       should outweigh some other man’s. A single day       pulls down any human’s scale of fortune       or raises it once more.  But the gods love                              170       men who possess good sense and self-control       and despise the ones who are unjust. I’m just as strong,       with the work of my own hands I have attained       achievements just as great, but, as you see,       these Argive insults have quite ruined me.                                        [440]       And yet I think I can affirm this much—       had Achilles lived and been about to judge       the man who should receive his weapons,       the prize for being the finest man in war,       no soldier would have put his hand on them